Why Use IRV
|
How Does IRV Work
|
Who Uses IRV
|
Who Supports IRV
|
Ballot Measure Victories (2002-2008):
Year |
Location |
Percentage Success |
|---|---|---|
| 2008 | Santa Fe, NM |
65.0 % Favored IRV |
| 2007 | Aspen, CO |
76.6 % Favored IRV |
| 2002 | Basalt, CO | 74.4% Favored IRV |
| 2004 | Berkeley, CA | 72.2% Favored IRV |
| 2005 | Burlington, VT | 64.5% Favored IRV |
| 2006 | Davis, CA | 55.4% Favored IRV |
| 2004 | Ferndale, MI | 69.75 % Favored IRV |
| 2006 | Minneapolis, MN | 64.9% Favored IRV |
| 2006 | Oakland, CA | 68.6 % Favored IRV |
| 2007 | Sarasota, FL | 77.6 % Favored IRV |
| 2006 | Pierce County, WA | 52.9% Favored IRV |
| 2007 | Pierce County, WA | 67% Favored Upholding Implementation Date |
| 2002 | San Francisco, CA | 55.5% Favored IRV |
| 2007 | Springfield, IL | 91% Favored IRV for Military & Overseas Voters |
| 2005 | Takoma Park, MD | 83.6% Favored IRV |
IRV has also been passed for all overseas and military voters in most runoffs in Arkansas, Louisiana and South Carolina. Charter amendments authorizing it have passed in San Leandro and Santa Clara County, CA and Vancouver, WA.